Curse

zwei2stein · Nov 25, 2007, 01:33 PM // 13:33

That there is no title for quests? While we get titles for plain idiotic stuff like sweet tooth and drunkyard, hay-i-life-to-grind points farming or

Quests provide most varied and generally quite enjoyable experience in gw, I dont recall any title that would promote more varied gameplay and offer a LOT to do without repetition, and beat most other titles in dificulty and dedication needed.

One would think that there ought to be some kind of recognition you would get for doing it all except having empty quest long and no "!"s on top of npc heads.

distilledwill · Nov 25, 2007, 01:39 PM // 13:39

Its a good point, there must be thousands of quests out there. Do you think it would be better to have a title for each campaign? Or just an overall one?
Say for 2500 quests completed or something

(maybe an exaggeration - anyone have an idea how many side quests there are in GW overall?)

JeniM · Nov 25, 2007, 01:43 PM // 13:43

No idea (how many quests there are) but it would motivate me to clean my quest log out more than the 50g and XP i get for them. WOW 50g AND useless XP thats worth the effort

Think it would have to be by number done as there are some do this or that and thats lots of IF and OR lines for Anet to program.
Good thing is they CAN see what quests we have done, the update were they gave skills to people that did a quest on the GWEN preview but didn't get the skill shows that

NeHoMaR · Nov 25, 2007, 01:44 PM // 13:44

Maybe is not hard to implement, but remember some quests are for tyrians only, profession only, and so on; So, no idea how many quests should they add for a maxed title.

Maybe a good idea will be counting only the quests available for all characters and professions, and count again in hard mode. Quest is hard mode is a very good idea IMO.

I say is easy to implement, because there are already a system ingame marking quests as done or undone.

JeniM · Nov 25, 2007, 01:56 PM // 13:56

Could be like GMC. Get titles for percentages of each land and a Ledgendary for all 3 (or 4 as GW:EN has quests but that didn't fit with my GMC comparison)

Fril Estelin · Nov 25, 2007, 02:02 PM // 14:02

Good idea. It should be in the Sardelac Sanitarium. This could help:
http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/Quest

Crom The Pale · Nov 25, 2007, 02:27 PM // 14:27

This title would have to exclude all primary quests and only be for optional quests I think.

Which does make sense since we have a statue for completing all of Sorrows Furnace quests, why not a title?

mazey vorstagg · Nov 25, 2007, 03:37 PM // 15:37

Definately

signed 100 times

Divinity Coast · Nov 25, 2007, 03:42 PM // 15:42

Really good idea. I like it. If its introduced I can have a title, without spending lots of money to get it. If its introduced, I can actually make money off this title..

You can't see me · Nov 25, 2007, 03:48 PM // 15:48

I agree, with all the useless titles out there now, this should definetly be a title.

Zinger314 · Nov 25, 2007, 04:51 PM // 16:51

Quests (level 20+) are stupid in Guild Wars, as they tell you where to go, no intelligence required. And chances are, you don't need the reward.

Red Sonya · Nov 25, 2007, 04:59 PM // 16:59

Yeah I'd like to see quest titles, but, have to exclude newbie areas as they won't give us those quests when we come from other chapters. A title for each chapter would be good and then one grand quest title for doing all that you can from each chapter. But that title should include all the elite areas and boss mob quests as well. That would be the elite quest title and only deserving of the elite players.

bobrath · Nov 25, 2007, 05:03 PM // 17:03

This idea has been out there for a while. In addition to the above comments, the one that comes up is how would you know which quest you've missed when you're at 998 of 1000 done?

They added an "uber quest" to FoW and UW to help you track their completion, but there's no visual marker or list of completed quests.

That being said - the completionist in me would really love to see this implemented since I *think* I've completed all the known quests.

Proff · Nov 25, 2007, 05:12 PM // 17:12

Why not? It's better than the exp rewards you get when you're already at 100+ skill points.

mazey vorstagg · Nov 25, 2007, 05:47 PM // 17:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobrath

This idea has been out there for a while. In addition to the above comments, the one that comes up is how would you know which quest you've missed when you're at 998 of 1000 done?

They added an "uber quest" to FoW and UW to help you track their completion, but there's no visual marker or list of completed quests.

That being said - the completionist in me would really love to see this implemented since I *think* I've completed all the known quests.

#

Have you done those ones you get from Bokka after the completion of Nightfall? :P
I bet hardly anyone has.

But on the point of knowing what needs doing. It's just the same as cartography. Without the mod you are almost working blind by the end. You'd just have to go through the quest checklist ticking off the ones you remember.

NeHoMaR · Nov 25, 2007, 06:11 PM // 18:11

In GW:EN you get points in a tittle for questing, right? the Master of the North.

ischuros · Nov 25, 2007, 06:15 PM // 18:15

Yeah, that's for missions and dungeons aswell.

This idea has been around since the explosion of titles, and I would consider it one of the most basic and best ones to implement. An Adventurer title track would be great, and pretty easy i assume.

/signed

Zeek Aran · Nov 25, 2007, 06:16 PM // 18:16

Until GWEN, all quests have been completely boring. Run here, kill that, carry this. That's all it ever is.

seut · Nov 25, 2007, 06:22 PM // 18:22

NPCs could offer "Adventurer's Books" to keep track..

Tyla · Nov 25, 2007, 06:34 PM // 18:34

signed signed....SIGNED............for obvious reasons